New England Journal of Medicine Urges the U.S. Supreme Court to be Skeptical
Posted by
Peter WetherallAugust 26, 2008 8:33 PMLast week, physicians came to the aid of Plaintiff's lawyers, citizens of Clark County and the American consumer of prescription medication. The editors of the New England Journal of Medicine filed a "friend-of-the-court brief" in the case of Wyeth v. Levine. Readers will know the Wyeth v. Levine case is pending before the United States Supreme Court.
The New England Journal of Medicine wrote in the brief, that lawsuits can serve as "a vital deterrent" and protect consumers if drug companies don't disclose risks of their drugs. The New England Journal acknowledged that the FDA is often called the "gold standard" in drug evaluation, but the journal urged the Supreme Court justices to be skeptical. The editors stated "The FDA alone simply lacks the ability to serve as the sole guarantor of drug safety," The journal noted that discoveries made by plaintiff's lawyers through liability litigation serve an important function and that the "FDA would be stripped of an essential source of information that the agency has consistently relied on when making its regulatory decision, and the American public would be deprived of a vital deterrent against pharmaceutical company misconduct." Many consumers recognize that importance of litigation for harmful drugs such as Vioxx, Chantix, Ketek, Reglan and Digoxin.
The editors joined 47 state attorneys general and two former FDA commissioners-David Kessler and Donald Kennedy in supporting Levine's position. The Bush Administration is supporting the position of Wyeth, and if this position is successful, the ability of a consumer to sue drug companies for harmful side effects will be non-existent.
Journal Editor, Dr. Jeffrey M. Drazen in an interview, stated that the FDA is overwhelmed in trying to keep up with drug safety problems, which can range from rare but serious side effects, to shortcomings in manufacturing plants oversees. He also said that the "court system represents one of the key defense mechanisms that individuals have if a manufacturer has not made the risks of a product clear to the public.